ANALYSIS & OPINION

A fluid situation

Mike Jones, vice-president of MicroCare, describes the use of fluids other than alcohol for cleaning fibre optic connectors

During the 1970s, Bell Labs was busy perfecting the technologies to commercialise fibre optic communications. They could see a time when all the copper wire in the world could not handle the volume of data that people would want to send over phone lines.

One of the issues with which they struggled was finding suitable ways to quickly and consistently clean the delicate fibre optic connectors. They found that even the slightest contamination on the end-faces significantly degraded the performance of their networks. The scientists at Bell Labs recommended using only 99 per cent reagent grade isopropyl alcohol (also known as 'IPA' and 'rubbing alcohol') for cleaning their fibre optic connectors.

They made this recommendation for two reasons: it was readily available, and it worked. It worked because the solvent provided additional chemical action to enhance the mechanical action provided by the cleaning device. Alcohol and other solvents were also effective at softening, loosening and/or dissolving dried-on contaminants and particulate.

Since that time much has changed. fibre optics technologies are no longer the exclusive technology of the monolithic phone company but an enabling capability of almost every company. Mobile video on demand has created demand for greater bandwidth. Computing technology has plummeted in cost and expanded in capability. All of this means networks have become larger, commonplace and faster. However fibre networks, as they have become ubiquitous have also become more fragile.

Today’s fibre, while more capable, is positively delicate. The first fibre link that Bell Labs built in 1976 operated at 44.7 mhz. The lasers generated a pulse of light that was enormously long by today’s standard. But as fast as it seemed at the time, in today’s world 44.7 mhz is positively slow. Modern networks work at gigahertz speeds which means the pulse of light is just inches long. Such an ephemeral signal is easily “knocked off the rails” by the slightest contamination on the end-faces.

Time for change

Everything has changed, except that technicians around the globe are still trying to clean their fibre with IPA. This is no longer a good idea.

First, reagent-grade IPA is not readily available to fibre optic technicians, and ordinary alcohol is completely unsuitable for cleaning fibre optics. For example, drug store IPA is not an optical-grade cleaner because it always is diluted with 30 per cent water to lower the cost. The mixture is packaged in plastic container from which all sorts of plasticizers and contaminates may leach. The container may be re-used, and it certainly will become contaminated over time.

Next, alcohol actually isn’t a very good cleaner. In terms of solvent technology, it’s pretty far down on the list of 'old technologies'. It has a very low density so it cannot easily clean particulate. It has a high boiling point so it is relatively slow to dry. It is easily saturated, so it will no longer be effective. Modern cleaning chemistries usually try to avoid, or at least minimize, the presence of alcohols in the fluid because of these problems.

Thirdly, IPA is easily contaminated. Alcohol has a property of being 'infinitely hygroscopic' which means it likes water; it wants to absorb water. This property means that IPA in loosely sealed bottles in the back of a truck will absorb moisture from the air along with any contamination that resides in the air. This is why IPA often leaves a 'water-mark' residue on the connector end-face. These residues can 'burn' into the surface of the glass and increase the signal loss of the connector permanently, requiring time-consuming re-termination.

Lastly, alcohol is flammable. It cannot be carried on to an airplane nor easily shipped without hazmat paperwork and fees. This means that technicians, installing and repairing fibre links in remote locations, often have to leave their cleaning fluid at home.

Becoming aware of the problems of alcohol, its use discontinued and dry cleaning was adopted. However, that has been proven to be less than desirable. Wiping dry on a fibre end-face will generate a static charge (technically known as a 'triboelectric charge'), which is extremely difficult to dissipate. This static charge turns the end-face into a microscopic magnet, attracting dust out of the air on to the heart of the end-face.

Triboeclectric charging will occur when rubbing any nonconductive surface with any dry wipe, such as a 'Cletop' or a fabric wipe. The build-up of this “static” charge on a connector end-face will attract unwanted airborne particulate and dust to the connector end-face. The condition will be exacerbated in dry conditions (low humidity) such as winter cold or desert heat.

Importance of cleanliness

With data rates over fibre only increasing, the need to clean properly has never been more important. A modern, water-free, high-purity fluid engineered for cleaning fibre optic connectors will both dissipate, and at least temporarily prevent, this build-up of triboelectric charges in the connector end-face. Therefore solvents should play an import role in cleaning.

During the wet/dry cleaning process, a section of the cleaning wipe is dampened with the cleaning fluid. The connector end-face is wiped, usually moving from the damp area towards the dry area of the cleaning material. (In the case of port cleaning sticks or automated devices, a cleaning stick or device is dampened with a solvent and used to clean the end-face.) When a fast-drying, static-dissipative fluid is used with a wipe or highly absorbent cleaning stick, no drying step is necessary. This saves time, money and cleaning supplies.

When selecting a fibre optic cleaning fluid, there are several factors that should be considered. The first consideration is whether the solvent readily removes a wide variety of soils and unwanted contaminates. Also, the user should make sure that the fluid is compatible with the wiping material or cleaning swabs. For example, one would not want to pair a solvent with a swab or wipe which was constructed of a material that the liquid would dissolve.

The second consideration is the safety of the solvent. Is the cleaning fluid flammable? Is the cleaning fluid safe for technicians to handle? Can it be shipped as a non-hazardour material? Will it freeze? Is it safe for the environment? The answers will be found on the product spec sheet and the MSDS sheet for the cleaning fluid

Speed is of the essence

Another consideration is the speed of drying of the solvent: faster is better. Slower drying solvents require more time or more wiping to dry (which can delay progress, and also contribute to static charge build-up). But more importantly, slower drying solvents can 'hang' in the split of the alignment sleeve of an adaptor or optical port of device. The trapped liquid, can then weep back onto the connector end-face spreading contamination. Very fast drying solvents will not remain in the liquid state long enough to become trapped within an alignment sleeve.

Another consideration is the packaging of the fluid. The ideal packaging will prevent spillage, prevent re-contamination of the fluid during storage and normal use, and only dispense in quantities that are well-suited for a single cleaning. The fluid should be safe to use over a wide temperature range and should not freeze in field applications. Spilling is another worry; it can be costly and dangerous, particularly in the case of flammable liquids. Open containers or pump-type dispensers can easily be contaminated from wipes, airborne contaminates or by refilling with unapproved fluids. Metered pumps are the ideal dispenser since the user cannot 'over apply' a solvent.

Consider also materials compatibility. A well-engineered fluid will be compatible and safe to use with a wide range of materials including optics, plastics, metals, elastomers, electronic assemblies and adhesives. A proper cleaning fluid will dry without residue, and will not create damage or alter the connector end-face, its housing, or surrounding associated equipment.

The environmental impact of the fluid is important as well. The U.S. Government has four classifications of chemicals effecting air quality and the environment. The classifications are VOCs (volatile organic compounds), ODPs (ozone depleting pollutants), HAPs (hazardous air pollutants), and lastly GWP (global warming potential). In general, most fluids cannot be positive in all four categories. For example, if a material is not a VOC then it probably has a higher global warming material. The best recommendation is to select the safest solvent that will satisfactorily perform the cleaning task and the best packaging to utilise as little fluid as possible.

Lastly, one must consider the cost, which must include the cost of the solvent, the safe storage and transport of the solvent, and the packaging of the solvent (the likely amount of solvent used per clean).

In conclusion, users will need new cleaning fluids in data centers, telco central offices, cable TV head-ends, and out in the field to clean today’s fibre optic connectors. There are many considerations that must be taken into account to provide the best product for the user. Price per can or bottle alone does not reflect the real cost. We all have responsibilities to provide for user with a fluid and a package that is safe, convenient, reliable and environmentally responsible.

 

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
Google icon
StumbleUpon icon
Digg icon
LinkedIn icon
Reddit icon
e-mail icon
Feature

CableLabs is spearheading efforts to develop a proposal that uses coherent optics to dramatically boost the capacity of hybrid fibre coaxial networks, reports Andy Extance

Feature

Systems vendors are using intelligent software to squeeze more performance from optical networks. Pauline Rigby reports on developments at OFC 2017